Not All Price Endings Are Created Equal: Price Points and Asymmetric Price Rigidity

Author/s

Daniel Levy, Avichai Snir, Alex Gotler, Haipeng (Allan) Chen

No.
2019-01
Date
PDF file

We document an asymmetry in the rigidity of 9-ending prices relative to non-9-ending prices. Consumers have difficulty noticing higher prices if they are 9-ending, or noticing price-increases if the new prices are 9-ending, because 9-endings are used as a signal for low prices. Price setters respond strategically to the consumer-heuristic by setting 9-ending prices more often after price-increases than after price-decreases. 9-ending prices, therefore, remain 9-ending more often after price-increases than after price-decreases, leading to asymmetric rigidity: 9-ending prices are more rigid upward than downward. These findings hold for both transaction-prices and regular-prices, and for both inflation and no-inflation periods.

JEL Classification: E31, L16, C91, C93, D80, M31

Keywords: Asymmetric Price Adjustment, Sticky/Rigid Prices, 9-Ending Prices, Psychological Prices, Price Points, Regular/Sale Prices

Last Updated Date : 05/01/2019