Federal, State, and Local Governments: Evaluating their Separate Roles in US Growth

Author/s

Matthew J. Higgins, Andrew T. Young and Daniel Levy

No.
2008-02
Date
PDF file

 

Matthew J. Higgins, Georgia Institute of Technology

Andrew T. Young, University of Mississippi

Daniel Levy, Bar-Ilan University

AbstractWe use US county level data (3,058 observations) from 1970 to 1998 to explore the relationship between economic growth and the extent of government employment at three levels: federal, state and local.  We find that increases in federal, state and local government employments are all negatively associated with economic growth.  We find no evidence that government is more efficient at more decentralized levels. While we cannot separate out the productive and redistributive services of government, we document that the county-level income distribution became slightly wider from 1970 to 1998. For those who justify government activities in terms of equity concerns – perhaps even trading off economic growth for equity – the burden falls on them to show that the income distribution would have widened more in the absence of government activities. We conclude that a release of government-employed labor inputs to the private sector would be growth-enhancing.

JEL Codes: O40, O11, O18, O51, R11, H50, H70

Keywords: Economic Growth, Federal Government, State Government, Local Government, Income Distribution, Government Employment, Decentralization Theorem, County-Level Data

Last Updated Date : 26/12/2012